Rule of Love and Rule of Faith in Augustine’s Hermeneutics: A Complex Dialectic of the Twofold Rules

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v20i2.499

Keywords:

De doctrina christiana, Augustine, rule of love, rule of faith, hermeneutics, allegorical interpretation, literal interpretation

Abstract

Since the sixteenth-century Reformation, literal interpretation of the Bible has been deemed the best hermeneutical method to unearth the biblical writers’ original meaning. For the Reformers, allegorical interpretation was denigrated for reading an extraneous, or spiritual, meaning into any text. Although Augustine was among the first who champions a literal interpretation of the Scripture—as he outlined in his De doctrina christiana—until recent decades, Augustine is still being perceived as inconsistent in following his hermeneutical method as it is attested in his interpretation of the Good Samaritan. In his interpretation, Augustine seems to have allegorized the parable, thus his method was accused of being inconsistent. Is it really the case? This article attempts to contest such an accusation by showing that Augustine’s method of interpretation cannot simply be categorized as either entirely literal or allegorical. Augustine never professes as a literalist, an exegete who only applies what is now known as a historical-critical method. On the other hand, he did not recklessly legitimate the application of allegorical reading to any text. Taken as a whole, Augustine’s hermeneutics revolves around a complex dialectic of regula dilectionis (the rule of love) and regula fidei (the rule of faith) that allows both interpretations to be considered to be true.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews, James A. Hermeneutics and the Church: In Dialogue with Augustine. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.

Augustine, Saint. On Christian Teaching. Translated by R.P.H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Boeve, L., M. Lamberigts, and M. Wisse, eds. Augustine and Postmodern Thought: A New Alliance Against Modernity. Leuven: Peeters, 2009.

Bruns, Gerald L. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.

Cameron, Michael. Christ Meets Me Everywhere: Augustine’s Early Figurative Exegesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Caputo, John D., and Michael J. Scanlon, eds. Augustine and Postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2005.

Cochrane, Arthur C., ed. Reformed Confessions of the 16th Century. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1966.

Froehlich, Karlfried. “‘Take up and Read’: Basics of Augustine’s Biblical Interpretation.” Interpretation 58, no. 1 (January 2004): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/002096430405800102.

Glowasky, Michael. “The Author Is the Meaning: Narrative in Augustine’s Hermeneutics.” Scottish Journal of Theology 71, no. 2 (May 2018): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930618000054.

Grant, Robert M. The Bible in the Church. New York: Macmillan, 1948.

Hanson, R.P.C. Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture. Louisville: WJK, 2002.

Helleman, Wendy Elgersma. “‘Abraham Had Two Sons’: Augustine and the Allegory of Sarah and Hagar (Galatians 4:21-31).” Calvin Theological Journal 48, no. 1 (2013): 35–64.

Litfin, Bryan M. “The Rules of Faith in Augustine.” Pro Ecclesia 14, no. 1 (February 2005): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/106385120501400106.

Macpherson, John. The Westminster Confession of Faith. New York: Wentworth, 2016.

Payne, J. Barton. “Biblical Problems and Augutine’s Allegorizing.” Westminster Theological Journal 14, no. 1 (1951): 46–53.

Philip, T.V. “The Authority of Scripture in the Patristic Period.” Indian Journal of Theology 23, no. 1–2 (1974): 1–8.

Polman, A.D.R. The Word of God According to St. Augustine. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1961.

Pool, Jeff B. “No Entrance into Truth Except through Love: Contributions from Augustine of Hippo to a Contemporary Christian Hermeneutic of Love.” Review and Expositor 101, no. 4 (December 2004): 629–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/003463730410100406.

Ramm, Bernard. Protestant Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1970.

Roukema, Riemer. “The Good Samaritan in Ancient Christianity.” Vigiliae Christianae 58, no. 1 (January 2004): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007204772812331.

Sawyer, M. James. “The History of the Doctrine of Inspiration from the Ancient Church through the Reformation.” Bible.org, June 3, 2004. Accessed April 27, 2019. https://bible.org/article/history-doctrine-inspiration-ancient-church-through-reformation.

Sell, Mark E. “Biblical Hermeneutics and Modern Linguistics” Logia: A Journal of Lutheran Theology 4, no. 2 (April 1995): 3–12.

Smith, Brett W. “Complex Authorial Intention in Augustine’s Hermeneutics.” Augustinian Studies 45, no. 2 (2014): 203–225. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies201411118.

Toom, Tarmo. “Augustine on Scripture.” In T&T Clark Companion to Augustine and Modern Theology, edited by C.C. Pecknold and Tarmo Toom, 75–90. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Toom, Tarmo. “Augustine’s Case for the Multiplicity of Meanings.” Augustinian Studies 45, no. 2 (2014): 183–201. https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies20141095.

Toom, Tarmo, ed. Patristic Theories of Biblical Interpretation: The Latin Fathers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Virkler, Henry A. Hermeneutics: Principles and Processes of Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.

Young, Frances. “Augustine’s Hermeneutics and Postmodern Criticism.” Interpretation 58, no. 1 (January 2004): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/002096430405800105.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2021

How to Cite

Yong, Steven. “Rule of Love and Rule of Faith in Augustine’s Hermeneutics: A Complex Dialectic of the Twofold Rules”. Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 20, no. 2 (December 28, 2021): 207–218. Accessed January 29, 2022. https://ojs.seabs.ac.id/index.php/Veritas/article/view/499.

Issue

Section

Articles