The Relevance of Émile Durkheim's Thoughts for Protestant Churches Revitalization Today

Authors

  • Jessica Novia Layantara Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v19i2.364

Keywords:

Émile Durkheim, Church Revitalization, Protestantism, Totem

Abstract

This paper will provide some efforts to revitalize Protestant churches today by analyzing the critical thinking of Émile Durkheim. Durkheim's observations and critiques of Protestantism in his day will be compared to the issues faced by the Protestant church today: the individualistic lifestyle of the congregation, lack of solidarity, individual cults, lack of respect for the sacred liturgy, and church worship, including holy communion, and no clear church rules. Furthermore, this paper also offers a systematic-constructive synthesis to revitalize the church, including reconfirmation of symbols, reclarification of the sacred and nonsacred, and also reformation involving new clans in the church.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bellah, Robert N. “Durkheim and Ritual.” Dalam The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, diedit oleh Jeffrey C. Alexander dan Philip Smith, 183–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521806725.008

Berkhof, Louis. Teologi Sistematika 5: Doktrin Gereja. Surabaya: Momentum, 2003.

Durkheim, Émile. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Diterjemahkan oleh John A. Spaulding dan George Simpson. London: Routledge Classics, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1522/cla.due.sui2

Durkheim, Émile. The Division of Labor in Society. Diedit oleh Lewis A. Coser. Diterjemahkan oleh W.D. Halls. London: Macmillan, 1984.

Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Diterjemahkan Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press, 1995.

Gans, Eric. “The Sacred and the Social: Defining Durkheim’s Anthropological Legacy.” Anthropoetics: The Journal of Generative Anthropology 6, no. 1 (2000): 1–7.

Gustavo, Luiz, and Cunha de Souza. “Division of Labour in Durkheim, Marx, and Honneth: Contributions to a Political Economy of Recognition.” Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences 18, no. 3 (2018): 654–668, https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.31068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.31068

Hanges, James Constantine. “Durkheim and Early Christianity.” Dalam Reappraising Durkheim for the Study and Teaching of Religion Today, diedit oleh Thomas A. Idinopulos and Brian C. Wilson, 143–162. Leiden: Brill, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379152_010

Idinopulos, Thomas. “Preface.” Dalam Reap-praising Durkheim for the Study and Teaching of Religion Today, diedit oleh Thomas A. Idinopulos and Brian C. Wilson, ix–xix. Leiden: Brill, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379152

Janssen, Jacques, dan Theo Verheggen. “The Double Center of Gravity in Durkheim’s Symbol Theory: Bringing the Symbolism of the Body Back In.” Sociological Theory 15, no. 3 (1997): 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00036

Luther, Martin. Three Treatises. Diterjemahkan oleh Charles M. Jacobs dan James Atkinson. Ed. ke-2. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1970.

Marsh, Charles, and John Perkins. Welcoming Justice: God’s Movement Toward Beloved Community. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2018.

Marshall, Douglas A. “Temptation, Tradition, and Taboo: A Theory of Sacralization.” Sociological Theory 28, no. 1 (2010): 64–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01366.x

Nielsen, Donald A. “Auguste Sabatier and the Durkheiminians on The Scientific Study of Religion.” Sociological Analysis 47 (1987): 283–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3710940

Ottati, Douglas F. Reforming Protestantism: Christian Commitment in Today’s World. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1995.

Pickering, W.S.F. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories. Cambridge: James Clark, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgf6sv

Pickering, W.S.F. “The Eternality of the Sacred: Durkheim’s Error?” Archives des sciences sociales des religions 69 (1990): 91–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/assr.1990.1316

Pruett, Gordon E. “A Note on Robert Bellah’s Theory of Religious Evolution: The Early Modern Period.” Oxford Journal Vol. 34 No. 1 (1973): 50–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3710279

Riley, Alexander. The Social Thought of Émile Durkheim. California: SAGE, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349565

Scimecca, Joseph. Christianity and Sociological Theory: Reclaiming the Promise. London: Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467660

Sitorus, Fitzerald Kennedy. “Theonomous, Autonomous, and Heteronomous Conscience: Conscience in Luther and Kant, and Indonesian Moral Perception.” Dalam Sola Scriptura in Asia, diedit oleh Yongbom Lee and Andrew R. Talbert, 89–107. Oregon: Wipf and Stock, 2018.

Sugiyarto, Wakhid, Suhanah, Reslawati, Nuhrison M. Nuh, Syaiful Arif, Asnawati, dan Sony Dandel. Pemimpin Gereja Moratorium Organisasi Gereja Dan HAM. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI, 2015.

Thompson, Andrew R.H. “Eco-Solidarity: Ecclesiology En Conjunto in the Anthropocene Epoch.” Anglican Theological Review 101, no. 4 (2019): 685–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000332861910100409

Downloads

Published

03-11-2020

How to Cite

Layantara, Jessica Novia. “The Relevance of Émile Durkheim’s Thoughts for Protestant Churches Revitalization Today”. Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 19, no. 2 (November 3, 2020): 135–150. Accessed December 27, 2024. https://ojs.seabs.ac.id/index.php/Veritas/article/view/364.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Jessica Novia Layantara

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.