Pregenealogical Coherence and Initial Text of the Gospel of Mark 1:41
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36421/veritas.v17i1.303Keywords:
New Testament Textual Criticism, Pregenealogical Coherence, Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, Mark 1:41, Initial TextAbstract
Discussion as to the text of Mark 1:41 is one of the most interesting textual discussions. Although most witnesses support the primacy of the reading σπλαγχνισθεὶς, most scholars consider that the reading is secondary. In this paper, the writer intends to show that the pregenealogical coherence analysis on the text strengthens the validity of the external evidences in supporting σπλαγχνισθεὶς as the initial text. These conclusive external evidences, therefore, must not be set aside. At the end of this paper, the writer will discuss in brief as to why the scribes altered the reading σπλαγχνισθεὶς to be ὀργισθείς.
Downloads
References
Black, David A. ed. Rethinking New Testament Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2002.
Brooks, James A. Mark. NAC. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.41485
Ebojo, Edgar B. “Men, Manuscripts, and Mercy: Searching a Merciful God amongst the Variants,” 1-12 (makalah yang tidak diterbitkan, disampaikan dalam Bible Research Seminar di AGST Filipina 2016).
Edwards, James R. The Gospel According to Mark. PNTC. Grand Rapids/Leicester: Eerdmans/Apollos, 2002.
Ehrman, Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: The Story behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2005.
Ehrman, Bart D. “A Leper in the Hand of an Angry Jesus.” Dalam Studies in the Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047409175
Ehrman, Bart D. dan Michael W. Holmes, eds., The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. NTTSD 42. Leiden: Brill, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004236554
Ellingworth, Paul. “Text, Translation, and Theology: The New Testament in the Original Greek?” Filologia Neotestamentaria 13, no. 25-26 (2000): 61-73
Epp, Eldon J. “The Twentieth Century Interlude in New Testament Textual Criticism,” Journal of Biblical Literature 93 (1974): 386-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3263386
Epp, Eldon J. “Multivalence of the Term ‘Original Text’ in New Testament Textual Criticism,” Harvard Theological Review 92 (1999): 245-81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000003394
Epp, Eldon J. dan Gordon D. Fee. Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.
France, R.T. The Gospel of Mark. NIGTC. Grand Rapids/Carlisle: Eerdmans/Paternoster, 2002.
Hooker, Morna D. The Gospel According to Saint Mark. BlackNTC. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1991.
Hurtado, Larry W. Mark. NIBC. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1989.
Kristianto, Stefanus. “Resensi Buku A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Coherence,” Jurnal Theologia Aletheia (terbit September 2018).
Marcus, Joel. Mark 1-8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AnchorBib; New Haven/London: YUP, 2008.
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament 2nd Edition. London/New York: UBS, 1994.
Parker, David C. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: CUP, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166942
Parker, David C. Textual Scholarship and the Making of the New Testament. Oxford: OUP, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657810.001.0001
Royse, James. Scribal Habits in Early Greek New Testament Papyri. NTTSD 36. Leiden: Brill, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161818.i-1055
Tan Kim Huat. The Gospel According to Mark. Asia Bible Commentary. Manila: Asia Theological Association, 2011.
Wachtel, Klaus dan Michael W. Holmes, eds. The Textual History of the Greek New Testament: Changing Views in Contemporrary Research. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.
Wallace, Daniel B. “The Gospel According to Bart: A Review Article of Misquoting Jesus by Bart Ehrman,” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 49, no. 2 (2006): 327-49.
Wallace, Daniel B. “Challenges in New Testament Textual Criticism for the Twenty-First Century,” Journal of Evangelical Theological Society 52, no. 1 (March 2009): 79-100.
Wasserman, Tommy dan Peter Gurry. A New Approach to Textual Criticism: An Introduction to the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method (Atlanta/Stuttgart: SBL/Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1whm8zr
Williams, Peter J. “An Examination of Ehrman's Case for οργισθείς in Mark 1:41,” Novum Testamentum 54 (2012): 1-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853611X593241
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Stefanus Kristianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
